Gyanvapi Masjid – In the case of Shringar Gauri, the plaintiff sought the right of regular worship
Arvind
Varanasi. In the Gyanvapi-Sringar Gauri case, the plaintiffs have been giving their arguments continuously for the last two dates. On Thursday also, the advocate put his point before the court, saying that everyone has the right to worship, then why don’t we. We should also be given the right to have regular darshan and worship of Shringar Gauri. The court has fixed July 25 as the next date of hearing.
During the hearing in the court of District Judge Dr. Ajay Krishna Vishwesh, Man Bahadur Singh, counsel for plaintiff number one Rakhi Singh, argued in the court that worship is a fundamental and civil constitution. Under this, people of every religion can worship their worship according to their belief. No one can stop him from this right. Under this, the right has been sought for regular worship of Maa Shringar Gauri in Gyanvapi. It is recorded in history that this place is a temple and it has been demolished. The place where the worship has been done, even after any kind of change, the importance of that place does not change. That place belongs to the deity. The worship of Shringar Gauri has been done regularly till 1993. After that it was banned. It is also not clear who imposed the ban. In such a situation, there is a right to worship.
Referring to the present location of Maa Shringar Gauri located in the Gyanvapi complex, he said that Maa Shringar Gauri is worshiped on the western wall of what is called a mosque. With this, the plaintiffs have completed their arguments. Before plaintiff number one, on behalf of plaintiff number two to five, his lawyer had placed before the court after himself. On the next date, on behalf of the respondent side, Anjuman Intejamiya Masajid will put forward his submissions in the form of a reply.
Administration complied with the order: After the completion of the argument in the court on behalf of the plaintiff, the District Government Advocate (Civil) Mahendra Kumar Pandey, on behalf of the respondent’s government and administration, put his point before the court. He said that the orders given by the court from time to time were complied with by the administration. During the action of the Advocate Commissioner on the orders of the court, the locks at the survey site were opened and broken. Security arrangements were made by sealing the area which was ordered to be sealed. Along with this, he was asked to make arrangements for Vaju. He said before the court that in future also, as per the order of the court, it will be followed.
